Ailko van der Veen

Email: A.vanderVeen@uva.nl
Phone: +31 (0)20 525 4025

 

Background and interests

Ailko van der Veen is the manager of the CREED-lab. He was a Ph.D.-student at CREED and received his PhD in 2012. His current work is in Behavioral Economics and Industrial Organization. During his undergraduate studies at the University of Amsterdam, he studied applied and theoretical topics in the field of Industrial Organization.

 

 

PUBLICATIONS 2016
Nosenzo, Daniele, Theo Offerman, Martin Sefton and Ailko van der Veen (2016) Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game Management Science 62, 502-517 Link to article
We experimentally investigate a repeated “inspection game” where, in the stage game, an employee can either work or shirk and an employer simultaneously chooses to inspect or not inspect. Combined payoffs are maximized when the employee works and the employer does not inspect. However, the unique equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of shirking/inspecting. We examine the effects of allowing the employer to sanction or reward the employee after she has inspected the employee. We find that rewards or sanctions can both discourage shirking, and have similar effects on joint earnings. In games allowing sanctions a reduction in shirking is accomplished with a lower inspection rate and the efficiency gains accrue to employers. In games allowing rewards employers actively reward employees for working and the efficiency gains are shared more equitably. A treatment where employers can combine sanctions and rewards leads to efficiencies similar to the single-instrument treatments, and outcomes more closely resemble those of the reward treatment in that the efficiency gains are shared.

 

PUBLICATIONS 2015
Offerman, Theo and Ailko van der Veen (2015) How to subsidize contributions to public goods - Does the frog jump out of the boiling water? European Economic Review 74, 98-108 Link to article
According to popular belief, frogs are boiled to death when the water is heated gradually. In this paper, we investigate how humans respond to a very slow versus a very steep increase of a subsidy on contributions to a public good. In an experiment, we vary the mode of the increase (gradual versus quick). When the subsidy is raised to an intermediate level, we see a modest effect in either treatment. When the subsidy is raised to a substantial level, there is a strong effect of a quick increase and a modest effect of a gradual increase in the subsidy.

 

PUBLICATIONS 2014
Nosenzo, Daniele, Theo Offerman, Martin Sefton and Ailko van der Veen (2014) Encouraging Compliance: Bonuses versus Fines in Inspection Games Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30, 632-648 PDF-file
In this paper we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an ‘inspection game’, where costly inspection allows an authority to detect whether or not an individual complies with some standard of behavior. Standard game theoretic analysis predicts that in the inspection game non-compliant behavior is deterred by fines targeted at non-compliant individuals, but encouraged by bonuses awarded to compliant individuals. In an experiment we find that fines are effective in deterring non-compliance. However, in agreement with recent behavioral theories, we find that the effect of bonuses on compliance is much weaker than predicted.